CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       122 of 122        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorComments
122

[View] 		G2minorMountain CaveEach Harvest, you may use the Mountain Cave to exchange up to 1 Wood for 1 Stone.1F1hala[39 Comments]
last post:
2012-09-06 15:42:04
by chris


id=1100
Pages:  [1] [2] [3] [4]

 COMMENTSauthor
Mountain Cave (minor)
Cost=1F,   Vps=1,   Prereq=none
Each Harvest, you may use the Mountain Cave to exchange up to 1 Wood for 1 Stone.

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]		 .hala
Oct 23, 2010 2:25pm
[quote]
(Edit: Jul 8, 2011 1:15pm)
Is is just me or does this picture look..... "explicit"? "offensive"?

I would make the text on all the cards say "for you only" to make it super clear since its a new mechanism.

Interesting variation of Stone Cart. Worth trying.		 zlorfik
Oct 25, 2010 12:48pm
[quote]
Thx zlorf. No offense was intended, but now that you mentioned it, yes, it looked quite offensive. Changed picture and added "for you only". hala
Oct 25, 2010 3:03pm
[quote]
I just drafted this and Forewoman. I'm gonna see how well the 2 combine chris
Jan 17, 2011 5:36pm
[quote]
I think the answer is "very well".

I think the card should be ammended to follow a structure such as Master Forester- a card that when the rewards start to get too good have a way for other players to counter it.

 trey
Jan 17, 2011 6:06pm
[quote]
Quote from: chris on Jan 17, 2011 5:36pm
I just drafted this and Forewoman. I'm gonna see how well the 2 combine

It was a nice combo, but the rest of my game wasn't on. No victory. I got 6 Stone and 9 Wood from the combo i think. But i had to play 1 Minor, 1 Occupation and take the Cave space twice. So it wasn't really fantastic. It took 3.5 actions and a cost of 1 Wood and 1 Food to get 9 Wood and 6 Stone.
 chris
Jan 17, 2011 7:36pm
[quote]
Is it a problem how this card combines with Forewoman and Foreman? Should the language on this card be changed to "instead of taking an action you may place a person on this card" instead of calling it an Action space? Or should the language on Forewoman be changed? chris
Jan 23, 2011 9:51am
[quote]
We could say this card does not accumulate anything else but stone, regardless of the existence of other cards. But is it necessary? hala
Jan 23, 2011 10:48am
[quote]
I don't like the concept of "action spaces only for you", as we cannot foresee what new cards will do with action spaces. Forewoman is 1 example where the other players have no chance to counter the effect, chisel in its earlier version was the same. Can we try a different language here without the wording of "action space"? tom
Mar 10, 2011 1:14pm
[quote]
Maybe this card should be removed from the deck and another card that doesn't create so many problems should be introduced instead. hala
Mar 10, 2011 1:39pm
[quote]
Pages:  [1] [2] [3] [4]
    [GO BACK to List View]       122 of 122        Jump to: