deck | type | name | text | cost | vps | prereq | author | Like It? | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4070 [View] | NL | minor | Dwelling Mound | Whenever you Plow, you must pay 1 Food for each new field. | 4 | Play in Round 2 or before | uwe | +0 0Y,0N [Vote Yes] [Vote No] | [7 Comments] last post: 2012-12-04 20:41:33 by chris |
id=1174 | Pages: [1] | |
COMMENTS | author | |
Dwelling Mound (minor) Cost=none, Vps=4, Prereq=Play in Round 2 or before Whenever you Plow, you must pay 1 Food for each new field. Dwelling Mound (minor) Cost=none, Vps=4, Prereq=Play in Round 2 or before Whenever you Plow, you must pay 1 Food for each new field. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
.uwe Oct 29, 2010 12:43pm [quote] (Edit: Nov 1, 2010 7:48pm) |
|
TRANSLATION DISCUSSION BEGINS. | ||
Warft: Das Pflugen eines jeden neuen Ackers kostet dich ab sofort 1 NW. Warft: Das Pflugen eines jeden neuen Ackers kostet dich ab sofort 1 NW. |
chris Oct 29, 2010 12:43pm [quote] (Edit: Oct 29, 2010 12:52pm) |
|
German speaker, how do you translate the German name of this card? German speaker, how do you translate the German name of this card? | chris Oct 29, 2010 12:43pm [quote] (Edit: Oct 29, 2010 2:11pm) |
|
"Dwelling mound" perhaps? Hill is too general, a Warft sure is a hill, but it is made by man with the specific reason to settle there and be protected from high tide and floodings. The text should start with Whenever: Whenever you plow, you must pay 1 Food for each new field that you plow. "Dwelling mound" perhaps? Hill is too general, a Warft sure is a hill, but it is made by man with the specific reason to settle there and be protected from high tide and floodings. The text should start with Whenever: Whenever you plow, you must pay 1 Food for each new field that you plow. |
zlorfik Oct 31, 2010 5:24am [quote] |
|
TRANSLATION DISCUSSION ENDS. GENERAL DISCUSSION BEGINS. | ||
I think this is a card well worth playing, your trading an early minor play that gives you no direct advantage and some late food for 4 points. Feels strong enough that i would play it most of the times (if i can and if i dont have Field Watchman) but nothing that needs to be curbed much. 3 points for example might be too low. All in all a well balanced card in my eyes! I think this is a card well worth playing, your trading an early minor play that gives you no direct advantage and some late food for 4 points. Feels strong enough that i would play it most of the times (if i can and if i dont have Field Watchman) but nothing that needs to be curbed much. 3 points for example might be too low. All in all a well balanced card in my eyes! |
zlorfik Nov 12, 2010 6:54am [quote] |
|
I agree on the balance. It seems about right, and it has a nice tension. My only concern is it might be frustrating when you don't get a real chance to play it in the first 2 rounds. I agree on the balance. It seems about right, and it has a nice tension. My only concern is it might be frustrating when you don't get a real chance to play it in the first 2 rounds. | tacticus Nov 12, 2010 11:11am [quote] |
|
Is this one [u]additional food[/u] or no? (If I have Plow driver and I'm already paying 1 food to plow then do I have to pay another?) Is this one additional food or no? (If I have Plow driver and I'm already paying 1 food to plow then do I have to pay another?) |
nwoll Dec 4, 2012 5:07am [quote] |
|
Ha ha, good point. Certainly the spirit of the card is 1 additional. Ha ha, good point. Certainly the spirit of the card is 1 additional. | chris Dec 4, 2012 8:41pm [quote] |
|
Insert: | ||
Pages: [1] |