CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       3945 of 3946        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorLike It?Comments
3945

[View] 		NLminorStockpileAt the beginning of each round (before Phase 1), if you have exactly 0-1/2-3/4-5/6+ Food in your personal supply, you receive 1 Wood/Clay/Reed/Stone. (You may give Food to the general supply at any time.)5W1uwe
+0

0Y,0N
[Vote Yes]
[Vote No]		[9 Comments]
last post:
2012-10-27 11:46:28
by zlorfik


id=1180
Pages:  [1]

 COMMENTSauthor
Stockpile (minor)
Cost=5W,   Vps=1,   Prereq=none
At the beginning of each round (before Phase 1), if you have exactly 0-1/2-3/4-5/6+ Food in your personal supply, you receive 1 Wood/Clay/Reed/Stone. (You may give Food to the general supply at any time.)

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]		 .uwe
Oct 29, 2010 1:14pm
[quote]
(Edit: Jun 24, 2011 2:28pm)
   TRANSLATION DISCUSSION BEGINS.
Eindecker:
Zu Beginn jeder Runde, noch vor Phase 1, erhaltst du 1 Baustoff aus dem allgemeinen Vorrat. Welchen Baustoff du erhaltst, ist abhangig davon, wie viele Nahrwertmarken du in deinem Vorrat hast: bei 0-1 NW erhaltst du Holz, bei 2-3 NW Lehm, bei 4-5 NW Schilf und ab 6 NW Stein.
(Du darfst Nahrwerte freiwillig in den allgemeinen Vorrat geben, um auf den Baustoff Einfluss zu nehmen.)
chris
Oct 29, 2010 1:14pm
[quote]
German speaker, based on the German text, if you have 7 Food, can you take a Stone? Also is the name translated correct? chris
Oct 29, 2010 1:15pm
[quote]
(Edit: Oct 29, 2010 2:11pm)
The name is not correct. It has nothing to do with a plane.
I suggest "Stockpiler". A person that stocks up on stuff for hard times.

It says you get a stone if you got 6 or more food. So it should say 6+ in the text.		 zlorfik
Oct 31, 2010 5:33am
[quote]
   TRANSLATION DISCUSSION ENDS. GENERAL DISCUSSION BEGINS.
I haven't tested this but it seems a bit overpowered. It's quite feasible you could drop it in round 1, then sit back and receive 13 resources. Plus it's not hard to have 6+food sitting around, so you can reap loads of stone or whatever.
Too powerful I think.		 cunning
Nov 11, 2010 3:48am
[quote]
I think this card is too powerful. Investing 3w early is a lot, but getting 12-13 resources is quite a lot. And it is really easy to get reed in the beginning, which is huge (play the card, take 2 food). ylathor
Dec 5, 2010 8:57am
[quote]
If you play this in Round 1, it looks like you are guaranteed 13 resources in return. That's nuts! tacticus
Dec 5, 2010 1:50pm
[quote]
UPDATE

old cost 3W
new cost 5W

=====
Uwe asks us, should this card have 1VP now?		 chris
Jun 12, 2011 5:47pm
[quote]
UPDATE added 1 VP chris
Jun 24, 2011 2:29pm
[quote]
Dang, we messed up the translation of the title. According to the picture, the title should be "Monoplane". Sorry, didnt reckognize that meaning of the title back in the days. zlorfik
Oct 27, 2012 11:46am
[quote]
Pages:  [1]
    [GO BACK to List View]       3945 of 3946        Jump to: