92 of 130
Jump to:
[Print]| id=2399 | ||
![]() ![]() |
COMMENTS | author |
|
Camembert (minor) Cost=none, Vps=1, Prereq=2 Occupations Place 1 Food each on 3 Action spaces (unoccupied or occupied) from the general supply. The next player to use the Action space receives the Food. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
May 24, 2011 11:54am [quote] (Edit: Oct 15, 2014 10:42pm) |
|
|
Can you place the food on round spaces that are not revealed? I would assume you could. Obviously, I am thinking of the situations where you know you will be the only one able to use an action in the next round (e.g. take starting player for round 7 family growth or other similar scenarios). |
Jan 3, 2012 1:23pm [quote] |
|
| I hadn't considered that. We can make the card allow whatever everyone feels is best. | Jan 3, 2012 1:31pm [quote] |
|
| I don't have a preference either way, but I figured this question would arise during a game. Either choice has it's benefits. I do like the concept that you have to think about how to get the food and when to play it. | Jan 3, 2012 1:55pm [quote] |
|
| i like only revealed action spaces. otherwise this card is almost a duck pond. | Mar 29, 2013 1:04pm [quote] |
|
|
UPDATE added "revealed" that was always my intention. |
Mar 29, 2013 2:19pm [quote] |
|
|
Quote from: chris on Mar 29, 2013 2:19pm UPDATE added "revealed" that was always my intention. Well if it doesn't say "unrevealed" I don't know why you would assume you could. I've never seen anyone try to put the food on unrevealed spaces. Foreman doesn't specify "revealed" action spaces. |
Mar 29, 2013 2:51pm [quote] |
|
|
Hmm.... good point. UPDATE removed "revealed" |
Mar 29, 2013 5:02pm [quote] |
|
| this is almost duck pond. it's really good in the stats also. i'm for changing the prereq. to 3 occs. | Apr 1, 2013 9:19am [quote] |
|
| These types of cards are always strong. This card will have stats similar to Duck Pond and Raspberries. I think it is fine as is. | Apr 1, 2013 4:16pm [quote] |
|
92 of 130
Jump to: