id=2972 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Cost=1W, Vps=0, Prereq=none Whenever every other player has more Family members than you, you may immediately build 1 or more rooms by paying their cost. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Wood Saw (minor)Jun 18, 2011 10:29pm [quote] (Edit: Oct 15, 2014 10:12pm) |
|
So its like a WHE that can't cut in line. You must have 2 family members and everyone else 3. Do people think it is priced right? Should it be cheaper? I thought of saying "Pay 1 Reed less." on the card. |
Here's a card to help with growing last. This allows you to get a little bit more done before you FG. Now you don't need to Build a room in the round before the person to your right takes FG. When the person to your right takes SP (to FG in the next round) you can still have your room unbuilt. In the next round after that person FGs, you can take SP and build your room at the same time. Then in the following round, you can FG.Jun 18, 2011 10:31pm [quote] (Edit: Jun 18, 2011 10:33pm) |
|
its a good card design/cpncept. would be cool to combo with late bloomer as well. |
i'd price it like the WHE.... 5w 1r to build a room.Jun 19, 2011 1:18pm [quote] |
|
Often u could fg twice in a row. | Jun 19, 2011 2:04pm [quote] |
|
i think i would just word it "if every other player has more family members than you". no need to restrict it to the beginning. | Jun 20, 2011 2:04am [quote] (Edit: Jun 20, 2011 2:05am) |
|
I think, as it is, that it's better than Pastor. I think it should cost "2w/2c". Also, if everybody has room and you are the last to grow, you may play this on sp then grow in the same round, and then the next round you can grow again. This is quite powerful and not that difficult to achieve. | Jun 20, 2011 2:30am [quote] |
|
if everybody has room it's unlikely that i can play sp first and fg with my 2nd action. if i am the only one who can fg i don't see a big problem with possible double fg. certainly much less than with WHE. | Jun 20, 2011 4:19am [quote] |
|
Quote from: letsdance on Jun 20, 2011 2:04am i think i would just word it "if every other player has more family members than you". no need to restrict it to the beginning. Great point. UPDATE: old: you needed 2 peeps to play the card and everyone needed 3+. new: everyone needs more than you |
Jun 20, 2011 6:25am [quote] |
|
so its WHE powered down - cost of 6w and 2r? and unable to jump fg line unless behind the other players... | Jun 21, 2011 1:03pm [quote] |
|
"If every other player has more Family members than you when you play this card, you may immediately build a room by paying its costs." |
I think it would sound more natural if you switch the sentence clauses around:Jun 21, 2011 1:13pm [quote] |
|