id=3213 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Cost=2R,2F, Vps=1, Prereq=none When you play this card, you may immediately play up to 2 Occupations. (You must still pay any additional costs of the Occupations.) [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Homework (minor)Jul 8, 2011 8:09am [quote] (Edit: Oct 15, 2014 10:31pm) |
|
I like the way you play 2 occp when you have no occp, might sound strong, but 2 early reed is a good cost. | Jul 8, 2011 8:11am [quote] |
|
Why not have it cost 2r2f and have it simply read "Immediately play 2 Occupations." | Jul 8, 2011 8:38am [quote] |
|
yea i figure the same, but not sure which is more clearer | Jul 8, 2011 9:03am [quote] |
|
This seems awfully strong. | Jan 6, 2012 10:42am [quote] |
|
The food cost needs to be part of the card, because the cost to play occupations can be variable otherwise. Unless you're talking about additional costs (e.g. for Chief or Lover). | Jan 6, 2012 11:18am [quote] |
|
Quote from: derakon on Jan 6, 2012 11:18am The food cost needs to be part of the card, because the cost to play occupations can be variable otherwise. Unless you're talking about additional costs (e.g. for Chief or Lover). Agree. I'd make the cost on the card 2 Reed and 2 Food. |
Jan 6, 2012 11:52am [quote] |
|
i think this is too expensive at 2r and 2f. it's almost unplayable in any game size other than a 4er where reed is much tighter. field study is much easier to play and you get 2 fields on the ground | Jan 26, 2012 4:59am [quote] |
|
I agree with hunter, but you could also consider to remove/change the preq. to allow later play in (non-)4ers. | Jan 26, 2012 6:03am [quote] |
|
Quote from: makun on Jan 26, 2012 6:03am I agree with hunter, but you could also consider to remove/change the preq. to allow later play in (non-)4ers. what fix should be done for betterment? remove the prereq or food cost? |
Jan 29, 2012 11:13pm [quote] |
|