CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       95 of 121        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorComments
95

[View] 		G3minorHomeworkWhen you play this card, you may immediately play up to 2 Occupations. (You must still pay any additional costs of the Occupations.)2R,2F1ss[25 Comments]
last post:
2014-10-15 22:30:51
by chris


id=3213
Pages:  [1] [2] [3]

 COMMENTSauthor
Homework (minor)
Cost=2R,2F,   Vps=1,   Prereq=none
When you play this card, you may immediately play up to 2 Occupations. (You must still pay any additional costs of the Occupations.)

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]		 .ss
Jul 8, 2011 8:09am
[quote]
(Edit: Oct 15, 2014 10:31pm)
I like the way you play 2 occp when you have no occp, might sound strong, but 2 early reed is a good cost. ss
Jul 8, 2011 8:11am
[quote]
Why not have it cost 2r2f and have it simply read "Immediately play 2 Occupations." inoshishi
Jul 8, 2011 8:38am
[quote]
yea i figure the same, but not sure which is more clearer ss
Jul 8, 2011 9:03am
[quote]
This seems awfully strong. tacticus
Jan 6, 2012 10:42am
[quote]
The food cost needs to be part of the card, because the cost to play occupations can be variable otherwise. Unless you're talking about additional costs (e.g. for Chief or Lover). derakon
Jan 6, 2012 11:18am
[quote]
Quote from: derakon on Jan 6, 2012 11:18am
The food cost needs to be part of the card, because the cost to play occupations can be variable otherwise. Unless you're talking about additional costs (e.g. for Chief or Lover).

Agree. I'd make the cost on the card 2 Reed and 2 Food.
 chris
Jan 6, 2012 11:52am
[quote]
i think this is too expensive at 2r and 2f. it's almost unplayable in any game size other than a 4er where reed is much tighter. field study is much easier to play and you get 2 fields on the ground hunter
Jan 26, 2012 4:59am
[quote]
I agree with hunter, but you could also consider to remove/change the preq. to allow later play in (non-)4ers. makun
Jan 26, 2012 6:03am
[quote]
Quote from: makun on Jan 26, 2012 6:03am
I agree with hunter, but you could also consider to remove/change the preq. to allow later play in (non-)4ers.

what fix should be done for betterment? remove the prereq or food cost?		 ss
Jan 29, 2012 11:13pm
[quote]
Pages:  [1] [2] [3]
    [GO BACK to List View]       95 of 121        Jump to: