deck | type | name | text | cost | vps | prereq | author | Like It? | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1013 [View] | WA | occ-1 | Goods Fraudster | Place 2 Wood, 2 Clay, 1 Stone and 1 Reed on this card. You may only use these resources to pay any Building costs or functions of a card. At the end of the next Harvest, you receive 1 Begging card for each resource still on this card. | 0 | uwe | +0 0Y,0N [Vote Yes] [Vote No] | [6 Comments] last post: 2021-06-10 06:22:45 by awlego |
id=4130 | Pages: [1] | ||
0
|
COMMENTS | author | |
Goods Fraudster (occ-1+) Place 2 Wood, 2 Clay, 1 Stone and 1 Reed on this card. You may only use these resources to pay any Building costs or functions of a card. At the end of the next Harvest, you receive 1 Begging card for each resource still on this card. Goods Fraudster (occ-1+) Place 2 Wood, 2 Clay, 1 Stone and 1 Reed on this card. You may only use these resources to pay any Building costs or functions of a card. At the end of the next Harvest, you receive 1 Begging card for each resource still on this card. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
.uwe Oct 22, 2012 8:20am [quote] |
||
Is this: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs) or (functions of a card)." or is it: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs or functions) of a card."? The former probably makes more sense. The later is hard to play and therefore weak. Is this: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs) or (functions of a card)." or is it: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs or functions) of a card."? The former probably makes more sense. The later is hard to play and therefore weak. |
chris Nov 7, 2012 3:31am [quote] |
||
[quote name=chris date=Nov 7, 2012 3:31am]Is this: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs) or (functions of a card)." or is it: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs or functions) of a card."? The former probably makes more sense. The later is hard to play and therefore weak. [/quote] The later is correct. German text: Diese Waren kannst du für Baukosten oder die Funktion von Karten ausgeben, du darfst sie aber nicht verschenken. "Baukosten" means cost that include Building resources only. Quote from: chris on Nov 7, 2012 3:31am Is this: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs) or (functions of a card)." or is it: "You may only use these resources to pay any (Building costs or functions) of a card."? The former probably makes more sense. The later is hard to play and therefore weak. The later is correct. German text: Diese Waren kannst du für Baukosten oder die Funktion von Karten ausgeben, du darfst sie aber nicht verschenken. "Baukosten" means cost that include Building resources only. |
unknown10617498 Jan 26, 2016 5:03pm [quote] |
||
Just curious... Building costs or card costs... So, this wouldn't count for a renovation then? Not really "building" anything... Just curious... Building costs or card costs... So, this wouldn't count for a renovation then? Not really "building" anything... | wallfly Jan 19, 2018 9:01am [quote] |
||
Banned for powerlevel in awlego's playgroup 2020/06/21 Banned for powerlevel in awlego's playgroup 2020/06/21 | awlego Jun 21, 2020 7:01am [quote] |
||
[quote name=awlego date=Jun 21, 2020 7:01am]Banned for powerlevel in awlego's playgroup 2020/06/21 [/quote] Interesting. This card is below average (2.1pwr) on this website, so I'm curious about why it's better in your playgroup? Do you draft higher than 9 maybe? Quote from: awlego on Jun 21, 2020 7:01am Banned for powerlevel in awlego's playgroup 2020/06/21 Interesting. This card is below average (2.1pwr) on this website, so I'm curious about why it's better in your playgroup? Do you draft higher than 9 maybe? |
nwoll Jun 22, 2020 3:20pm [quote] |
||
We draft 10, but it's much much better in 3p than in 4p because of lower stone and clay access and my play group is often 3p. 2.1pwr should be for 4p stats... I'm curious what the 3p stats are for it. We draft 10, but it's much much better in 3p than in 4p because of lower stone and clay access and my play group is often 3p. 2.1pwr should be for 4p stats... I'm curious what the 3p stats are for it. |
awlego Jun 10, 2021 6:22am [quote] |
||
Insert: | |||
Pages: [1] |