4140 of 4221
Jump to:
[Print]| id=4664 | ||
![]() |
COMMENTS | author |
|
Spielwiese (minor) Cost=1F, Vps=0, Prereq=At most 1 Occupation Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck and add them to your hand. Look at the player size number on each card (either 1, 3, or 4). Take as many different Building resources as the smaller of the two numbers. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Jan 11, 2013 9:57pm [quote] (Edit: Feb 10, 2014 5:52pm) |
|
| TRANSLATION DISCUSSION BEGINS. | ||
| TRANSLATION DISCUSSION ENDS. GENERAL DISCUSSION BEGINS. | ||
|
This is our current balanced version for Uwe. Original card is here: http://play-agricola.com/Agricola/Cards/index.php?id=4629 |
Jan 11, 2013 10:32pm [quote] |
|
|
GAME REPORT: Kimball played the new version and received 3 building resources and drew Head of Family!! It was too good. |
Jan 12, 2013 7:58am [quote] |
|
|
UPDATE old: Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck and add them to your hand. Look at the player size number in the box on the left of each card (either 1, 3, or 4). You may immediately take as many different Building resources as the SMALLER of the two numbers. new: Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck. Immediately discard 0/1/2 of them and take 0/1/2 different building resources from the supply. Add the remaining Occupation(s) to your hand. |
Jan 12, 2013 7:58am [quote] |
|
|
GAME REPORT Kimball played this new version. It looked balanced. He discarded 1 occ and took 1 Reed. Therefore he received the Grump Occupation and 1 Reed for playing this Minor and paying 1 Food. |
Jan 12, 2013 11:12pm [quote] |
|
| Do people think I should remove the prereq now that the text has changed? | Jan 12, 2013 11:13pm [quote] |
|
| Thematically it's not needed. Power-wise it seems like it's not needed. Remove it! | Jan 18, 2013 10:56am [quote] |
|
|
The problem with this newest version is that eliminated all use of the player number, which I think was a neat and unique feature Uwe was trying to incorporate. Maybe something like: "Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck and add them to your hand. You may immediately discard 1 of them to receive a number of different building resources equal to the difference of the 2 player size numbers on the left of the cards." I think this will pay out somewhat similarly to the version you've got here now, but still uses the intended feature. |
Jan 23, 2013 10:57pm [quote] |
|
|
Yeah, we should try to find a way to incorporate the player number. It was an important part of the concept. Maybe "Draw and reveal two occupations from the deck. For each card with 1/3/4 as the minimum number of players, add 1 Wood/Clay/Reed to your supply."? That way, it's always two random resources and two occupations and can be costed appropriately. |
Jan 24, 2013 2:02am [quote] |
|
|
"Add the remaining occupation(s) to your hand." Could this be interpreted as the entire draw pile? |
Jan 24, 2013 5:27am [quote] |
|
4140 of 4221
Jump to: