id=4664 | |||
0
|
COMMENTS | author | |
Cost=1F, Vps=0, Prereq=At most 1 Occupation Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck and add them to your hand. Look at the player size number on each card (either 1, 3, or 4). Take as many different Building resources as the smaller of the two numbers. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Spielwiese (minor)Jan 11, 2013 9:57pm [quote] (Edit: Feb 10, 2014 5:52pm) |
||
TRANSLATION DISCUSSION BEGINS. | |||
TRANSLATION DISCUSSION ENDS. GENERAL DISCUSSION BEGINS. | |||
Original card is here: http://play-agricola.com/Agricola/Cards/index.php?id=4629 |
This is our current balanced version for Uwe.Jan 11, 2013 10:32pm [quote] |
||
Kimball played the new version and received 3 building resources and drew Head of Family!! It was too good. |
GAME REPORT:Jan 12, 2013 7:58am [quote] |
||
old: Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck and add them to your hand. Look at the player size number in the box on the left of each card (either 1, 3, or 4). You may immediately take as many different Building resources as the SMALLER of the two numbers. new: Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck. Immediately discard 0/1/2 of them and take 0/1/2 different building resources from the supply. Add the remaining Occupation(s) to your hand. |
UPDATEJan 12, 2013 7:58am [quote] |
||
Kimball played this new version. It looked balanced. He discarded 1 occ and took 1 Reed. Therefore he received the Grump Occupation and 1 Reed for playing this Minor and paying 1 Food. |
GAME REPORTJan 12, 2013 11:12pm [quote] |
||
Do people think I should remove the prereq now that the text has changed? | Jan 12, 2013 11:13pm [quote] |
||
Thematically it's not needed. Power-wise it seems like it's not needed. Remove it! | Jan 18, 2013 10:56am [quote] |
||
"Reveal 2 Occupations randomly from the deck and add them to your hand. You may immediately discard 1 of them to receive a number of different building resources equal to the difference of the 2 player size numbers on the left of the cards." I think this will pay out somewhat similarly to the version you've got here now, but still uses the intended feature. |
The problem with this newest version is that eliminated all use of the player number, which I think was a neat and unique feature Uwe was trying to incorporate. Maybe something like:Jan 23, 2013 10:57pm [quote] |
||
That way, it's always two random resources and two occupations and can be costed appropriately. |
Yeah, we should try to find a way to incorporate the player number. It was an important part of the concept. Maybe "Draw and reveal two occupations from the deck. For each card with 1/3/4 as the minimum number of players, add 1 Wood/Clay/Reed to your supply."?Jan 24, 2013 2:02am [quote] |
||
Could this be interpreted as the entire draw pile? |
"Add the remaining occupation(s) to your hand."Jan 24, 2013 5:27am [quote] |
||