CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       13 of 130        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorComments
13

[View] 		G2minorKeysYou can use the "Build room(s) and/or Build stable(s)" Action space, even if another player has already placed a person on it.1S1agrigal[49 Comments]
last post:
2020-10-31 23:51:32
by lass92


id=539
Pages:  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

 COMMENTSauthor
Keys (minor)
Cost=1S,   Vps=1,   Prereq=none
You can use the "Build room(s) and/or Build stable(s)" Action space, even if another player has already placed a person on it.

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]		 .agrigal
Aug 5, 2010 10:49pm
[quote]
(Edit: Jan 1, 2011 12:04pm)
Maybe this would be more useful if you made it cheaper and removed the prereq. Then someone could use this earlier in the game.

I like the idea. There are a couple of occupations that allow you to use Build Room if it is already taken but no minors.

Maybe Cost: 1 Clay, VP: 0, Prereq: none
I would also suggest Cost: 1 Stone, VP: 1, Prereq: none
but the second would be very weak in 1,2,3-ER since Stone is hard to get early.		 chris
Aug 6, 2010 10:39pm
[quote]
yup, i would not play that if its a 3 occp. but i guess a 1 occp prereq should be ok.
afterall, taking an occupied action is still good. (somemore its an fg related action)		 ss
Aug 6, 2010 10:54pm
[quote]
In 1,2,3-er it is not hard to reach the build room space anyway.

I support chris' second one.		 ccc
Aug 7, 2010 3:33am
[quote]
Revised to Chris's second option. agrigal
Aug 7, 2010 8:55am
[quote]
I believe this card doesn't need a VP. It is appealing enough without it. hala
Aug 7, 2010 10:03am
[quote]
I just added the vp b/c of the stone cost. agrigal
Aug 7, 2010 11:49am
[quote]
I like the VP. It makes it playable in 1,2,3-ER. Now you can just play it for the VP because its hard to get Stone early to use this for your early room builds (in 1,2,3-ER) and you don't need its function as much since Room Build isn't as busy. chris
Aug 7, 2010 3:02pm
[quote]
i think the stone cost should be removed. it makes it harder to be played in 1-3er where it is already weaker.

a nicer balancing feature might be to pay 1f to every player who already has a family member on the build room and/or stable action when you take it.		 letsdance
Dec 22, 2010 7:48am
[quote]
Quote from: letsdance on Dec 22, 2010 7:48am
i think the stone cost should be removed. it makes it harder to be played in 1-3er where it is already weaker.

a nicer balancing feature might be to pay 1f to every player who already has a family member on the build room and/or stable action when you take it.

Disagree. Its not as important to play early in 1-3er since build room is not as congested. You can just play this late game for the 1 VP.		 chris
Dec 22, 2010 7:51am
[quote]
Pages:  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
    [GO BACK to List View]       13 of 130        Jump to: