id=561 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Cost=none, Vps=0, Prereq=none Your fields no longer need to be orthogonally adjacent to each other. Fields plowed at the same time must be adjacent. At the end of the game, you receive 1/2/3 Bonus points for 3/4/5 fields that are not orthogonally adjacent to another field. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Landscape Design (minor)Aug 6, 2010 9:59am [quote] (Edit: Aug 29, 2011 11:12am) |
|
A lot of fun. Hell, thats great fun. | Aug 6, 2010 10:19am [quote] |
|
lol -- I've always wanted to make a symetrical farm. Should it have some costs? | Aug 6, 2010 10:59am [quote] |
|
Very nice. | Aug 6, 2010 12:26pm [quote] |
|
bilateral symmetry is pretty tough, i guess you need a minimum of 7 rooms, although 12 in a big oval would be sweet | Aug 6, 2010 1:01pm [quote] |
|
Agrigal, great card. | Aug 6, 2010 10:11pm [quote] |
|
does not affect your house but somehow limited fences. I think 5VP is move than enough for the weird fences, we should weaken it a little bit. Maybe say you cannot sow disconnected fields in one action (for the theme) or just scrap the bonus VP and put some reward on sowing isolated fields. |
hmm, 5 fields max bonus 5VP (in a W shape).Aug 7, 2010 6:42am [quote] |
|
I disagree Jingking. I think it will be hard to have a very functional farm with 5 disconnected fields. Your fences would be a mess or extremely limited. I would guess that most people would do 4 corners. Although an X pattern with 4 stables (one of them fenced) and 6 rooms would look really cool. Still, this is not going to get you a lot of points unless you have cards that give vps for rooms (strongbox, mansion, chief, 1/2 timber) | Aug 7, 2010 8:38am [quote] |
|
I can't wait to test it. I already had figured out what my house/fences/stables/fields layout would be. | Aug 7, 2010 10:19am [quote] |
|
When you say "touch or border," what does that mean? If it simply means "orthogonally adjacent," maybe you should just repeat the phrase (as ugly as it is), or remove the "touch" and leave it at "border" (which has a natural meaning very close to orthogonally adjacent). The inclusion of "touch" makes it sound like diagonal cards might count too, and if that's intended, it should be clearer. | Aug 7, 2010 5:03pm [quote] |
|