CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       130 of 130        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorComments
130

[View]
G2minorUndisturbed PondPlace 1 Food on each of the next Round spaces, up to the number of completed rounds. At the start of these rounds, you receive the Food.1No Occupationsglengarry[35 Comments]
last post:
2011-06-05 08:06:27
by glengarry


id=709
Pages:  [1] [2] [3] [4]

COMMENTSauthor
Undisturbed Pond (minor)
Cost=none,   Vps=1,   Prereq=No Occupations
Place 1 Food on each of the next Round spaces, up to the number of completed rounds. At the start of these rounds, you receive the Food.

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]
.glengarry
Aug 22, 2010 12:42pm
[quote]
(Edit: Apr 28, 2011 1:17pm)
Interesting. I'd play it without regret in Round 1, often. tacticus
Aug 22, 2010 1:33pm
[quote]
tweaked. always technically playable for 1vp (so long as you have no occs) but food is only available except in rounds 3-7. i considered making the food come at the end of the game, but it will be more often than not worth waiting a couple rounds.

i am really torn on the issue of easy-to-play minors in round 1. i think most of the good players understand how valuable it is to have them, and on the one hand, i think G2 needs some. on the other hand, we all know how brutal it is to go 4th, and have the player who went first go Occ; then SP. This card is one minor blow against that tyranny, haha.
glengarry
Aug 22, 2010 1:51pm
[quote]
yes for me. ss
Aug 22, 2010 9:53pm
[quote]
Its more Agricola-like to say, "If there are 7/8/9/10/11/12 rounds left to play, place 1 Food on the next 6/5/4/3/2/1 rounds. At the start of those rounds, you receive the Food."

Cards start with the "if clause" or time information.
chris
Aug 25, 2010 2:41pm
[quote]
nods, appreciated. If I didn't want there to be a few more Ponds in the game, I'd have called this 'Liquid Alms' haha.

my intention is that this is playable in round 1, but for no food. so i'm rewiring it a bit to make it clear. obviously like Alms, the tradeoff being: its worth a VP but with less flexibility and no immediate Food delivery.
glengarry
Aug 25, 2010 3:34pm
[quote]
(Edit: Aug 25, 2010 3:47pm)
Maybe add in parenthesis, "(You may play this in Round 1 for zero Food)". chris
Aug 27, 2010 5:43pm
[quote]
I like cards with a "No Occupations"-requirement because they help with an alternative strategy, namely not playing occs early stijn263
Aug 29, 2010 2:27pm
[quote]
Quote from: chris on Aug 27, 2010 5:43pm
Maybe add in parenthesis, "(You may play this in Round 1 for zero Food)".

I don't think this is neccessary.
hala
Aug 30, 2010 2:06am
[quote]
Uwe likes this and recommends removing the 1 VP:
http://play-agricola.com/forums/index.php?topic=2474
chris
Dec 24, 2010 2:30pm
[quote]
Pages:  [1] [2] [3] [4]
    [GO BACK to List View]       130 of 130        Jump to: