id=731 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Whenever you play an Improvement, you receive 1 Food before paying the costs of the Improvement. If the Improvement has a printed Stone cost, you receive 2 Food instead of 1. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Engineer (occ-3+)Aug 24, 2010 2:48pm [quote] (Edit: Mar 27, 2011 3:33pm) |
|
Just a wording thing: right now it's not clear that you get a food every time you play an improvement. Could be "Whenever you play an improvement, you receive one food before paying the costs of the improvement." | Aug 24, 2010 3:43pm [quote] |
|
simple and novel. i like it. | Aug 24, 2010 5:05pm [quote] |
|
but that doesn't mean this is stronger than Patron, since "Play 1 Occupation" is a strong action. |
my impression is that on average people play more improvements than occupations,Aug 24, 2010 6:11pm [quote] |
|
Quote from: jingking on Aug 24, 2010 6:11pm my impression is that on average people play more improvements than occupations, but that doesn't mean this is stronger than Patron, since "Play 1 Occupation" is a strong action. i don't think so. occs are generally stronger than improvements (minors at least) and patron gives 2f, not 1. but i agree you general you play more improvements than occs. i think this is closer in strength to foreman. |
Aug 24, 2010 9:10pm [quote] |
|
Quote from: tacticus on Aug 24, 2010 3:43pm Just a wording thing: right now it's not clear that you get a food every time you play an improvement. Could be "Whenever you play an improvement, you receive one food before paying the costs of the improvement." Sorry, I don't get your point. Could you have an example where the current wording will be confusing? |
Aug 25, 2010 4:25pm [quote] |
|
Quote from: colby on Aug 25, 2010 4:25pm Sorry, I don't get your point. Could you have an example where the current wording will be confusing? I've just played Engineer. I play "an improvement" and receive 1 food. I play another improvement, and reach for the food: my opponent smacks my hand, and points out that the card only references one improvement. In other words, I think you need "whenever." I know it's nit-picky, but it's also pretty standard Agricola language. I basically copied the format of the Bookshelf exactly. |
Aug 25, 2010 4:32pm [quote] (Edit: Aug 25, 2010 4:33pm) |
|
Gotcha. I changed the text. Thanks, tacticus. By the way, whenever I used a photo outside of the database here, the whole card doesn't show up. Does anyone know what the problem might be? | Aug 25, 2010 4:39pm [quote] |
|
I think the card is weak. Unless you have Braggart, how many improvements would one play during a game? Around 6 I'd say. Early occupation for 6 food is a bad investment. Maybe, I don't know, 2f whenever you buy a major improvement (or an upgrade to a major) and 1f whenever you play a minor. As for the name, it's not good for that time period. | Sep 29, 2010 1:14am [quote] |
|
I think Engineer is an ok name, but something like Village Planner or Master Craftsman would be better. |
I think it should be 1f for a Minor and 2f for a Major. I like the card, even if it's on the weaker side. Not every card has to be a powerhouse and not every card has to be of equal power.Sep 29, 2010 3:43pm [quote] |
|