id=7425 | Pages: [1] | |
![]() ![]() |
COMMENTS | author |
Cost=2F, Vps=0, Prereq=none You can immediately take a "Build Fences" action, during which you do not have to pay wood for fences that you build next to field tiles. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Field Fences (minor)Feb 6, 2016 9:44pm [quote] (Edit: Dec 29, 2017 10:13pm) |
|
i would say too strong (3w + an action ~2vp, so in total 4-6 vp...) | Feb 8, 2016 8:32pm [quote] |
|
but it is still a strong minor. Better than Hammer. It needs a higher cost and maybe 3 or 4 occs prereq. |
Well i just played this but since there are no plows in the T deck, it was hard to plow so i got no free fences....Feb 9, 2016 2:00am [quote] |
|
Quote from: nwoll on Feb 9, 2016 2:00am Well i just played this but since there are no plows in the T deck, it was hard to plow so i got no free fences.... but it is still a strong minor. Better than Hammer. It needs a higher cost and maybe 3 or 4 occs prereq. This card is not fun if the player just play it for fence action. It should have "1 field" or "2 fields" prerequisite. The strength is ok then and it will be different enough from hammer. |
Feb 13, 2016 1:37pm [quote] |
|
I actually think this should be passing (even though that makes it more like Hammer). | Feb 16, 2016 6:33am [quote] |
|
Quote from: oxmond on Feb 13, 2016 1:37pm This card is not fun if the player just play it for fence action. that changes dramatically if you save a few wood when doing so? i think it's not very exciting in any case, it just removes the endgame struggle for fencing actions. we don't need another hammer. |
Feb 17, 2016 5:45pm [quote] |
|
Hammer is a pretty strong card - this is much, much stronger, and probably too good. This card would be great even without the field bonus | Apr 5, 2016 5:29am [quote] |
|
T-FieldFences - 3.38 - Plays (32 / 34 = 94.1%) - Wins (15 / 32 = 46.9%) - PWR = 6.3 [7.6,5.0] [8.2,4.4] |
How should we nerf this? Can we change the cost to 3 Food or 2 Food?Jan 24, 2017 4:41pm [quote] |
|
Quote from: chris on Jan 24, 2017 4:41pm How should we nerf this? Can we change the cost to 3 Food or 2 Food? T-FieldFences - 3.38 - Plays (32 / 34 = 94.1%) - Wins (15 / 32 = 46.9%) - PWR = 6.3 [7.6,5.0] [8.2,4.4] Replace it. Shouldn't "replace" always be the preferred option with T deck cards? We have unselected published cards with proven stats that won't even need testing. (as an aside, I think players are interpreting "next" to field tiles to mean only the long edge of a fence is considered but technically 1 side of a field tile can have 3 fence peices "next" to it. So that's an issue.) |
Jan 24, 2017 6:59pm [quote] (Edit: Jan 24, 2017 6:59pm) |
|
Pages: [1] |