CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       99 of 481        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorComments
99

[View] 		TminorField FencesYou can immediately take a "Build Fences" action, during which you do not have to pay wood for fences that you build next to field tiles.2F0uwe[8 Comments]
last post:
2017-01-24 18:59:14
by nwoll


id=7425
Pages:  [1]

 COMMENTSauthor
Field Fences (minor)
Cost=2F,   Vps=0,   Prereq=none
You can immediately take a "Build Fences" action, during which you do not have to pay wood for fences that you build next to field tiles.

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]		 .uwe
Feb 6, 2016 9:44pm
[quote]
(Edit: Dec 29, 2017 10:13pm)
i would say too strong (3w + an action ~2vp, so in total 4-6 vp...) sebosch
Feb 8, 2016 8:32pm
[quote]
Well i just played this but since there are no plows in the T deck, it was hard to plow so i got no free fences....
but it is still a strong minor. Better than Hammer.

It needs a higher cost and maybe 3 or 4 occs prereq.		 nwoll
Feb 9, 2016 2:00am
[quote]
Quote from: nwoll on Feb 9, 2016 2:00am
Well i just played this but since there are no plows in the T deck, it was hard to plow so i got no free fences....
but it is still a strong minor. Better than Hammer.

It needs a higher cost and maybe 3 or 4 occs prereq.


This card is not fun if the player just play it for fence action.

It should have "1 field" or "2 fields" prerequisite. The strength is ok then and it will be different enough from hammer.		 oxmond
Feb 13, 2016 1:37pm
[quote]
I actually think this should be passing (even though that makes it more like Hammer). guy
Feb 16, 2016 6:33am
[quote]
Quote from: oxmond on Feb 13, 2016 1:37pm
This card is not fun if the player just play it for fence action.
that changes dramatically if you save a few wood when doing so? i think it's not very exciting in any case, it just removes the endgame struggle for fencing actions. we don't need another hammer.
 letsdance
Feb 17, 2016 5:45pm
[quote]
Hammer is a pretty strong card - this is much, much stronger, and probably too good. This card would be great even without the field bonus adamp
Apr 5, 2016 5:29am
[quote]
How should we nerf this? Can we change the cost to 3 Food or 2 Food?

T-FieldFences - 3.38 - Plays (32 / 34 = 94.1%) - Wins (15 / 32 = 46.9%) - PWR = 6.3 [7.6,5.0] [8.2,4.4]		 chris
Jan 24, 2017 4:41pm
[quote]
Quote from: chris on Jan 24, 2017 4:41pm
How should we nerf this? Can we change the cost to 3 Food or 2 Food?

T-FieldFences - 3.38 - Plays (32 / 34 = 94.1%) - Wins (15 / 32 = 46.9%) - PWR = 6.3 [7.6,5.0] [8.2,4.4]

Replace it.
Shouldn't "replace" always be the preferred option with T deck cards? We have unselected published cards with proven stats that won't even need testing.


(as an aside, I think players are interpreting "next" to field tiles to mean only the long edge of a fence is considered but technically 1 side of a field tile can have 3 fence peices "next" to it. So that's an issue.) 		nwoll
Jan 24, 2017 6:59pm
[quote]
(Edit: Jan 24, 2017 6:59pm)
Pages:  [1]
    [GO BACK to List View]       99 of 481        Jump to: