id=8149 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Each time you use the "Take Reed Stone Food (or Wood)" action space with the 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th person you place, you also get 1 wood/clay/reed/stone/stone. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Building Expert (occ-4+)May 12, 2016 3:36am [quote] (Edit: Nov 17, 2017 11:25pm) |
|
1st/2nd/3rd matches wood/clay/reed+stone? |
I thought this was messed up but maybe it works?Aug 29, 2016 3:50pm [quote] |
|
Each time you use the "Take Reed Stone Food (or Wood)" action space with your 1st/2nd/3rd/higher person, you receive 1 additional wood/clay/reed/stone. The format should be 1/2/3+ or 1/2/3/4+ - whatever Uwe is intending... |
I feel this card needs re-wording... How about:Sep 3, 2016 6:26am [quote] (Edit: Sep 16, 2016 7:10am) |
|
My suggestion comes mainly because in 5er, no chance this is ever paying out more than a wood or clay. I can see the stone and reed paying out twice in 4er, and with a combo 3-4 times. Maybe Joiner needs reworded to fit, and maybe that won't work at all, but thought I'd throw it out there. |
I can't find if the G4 card "Joiner" got chosen to go in to AG3. If not, (and looking at the card I don't see letter/numbers by it) could that replace this? Not sure of the whole code thing on these cards.Sep 3, 2016 10:45am [quote] |
|
As written, you can clearly get stone AND something, but it's not clear if you get that on the 3+ case, or all cases |
This card's text is very poor. Not clear if the stone applies to the reed case, every case, or the 4+ case.Sep 16, 2016 5:38am [quote] (Edit: Sep 16, 2016 6:02am) |
|
This card seems pretty straight forward. If you use your first peep on rsw you receive a wood. If you use your second you receive a clay. If you use your third or higher peep you receive both a stone and a reed. | Sep 16, 2016 6:14am [quote] |
|
Quote from: ken on Sep 16, 2016 6:14am This card seems pretty straight forward. If you use your first peep on rsw you receive a wood. If you use your second you receive a clay. If you use your third or higher peep you receive both a stone and a reed. That would make sense but getting a stone with each pair seems like it could easily be that as well. Unfortunately Wallfly is thinking about how the card SHOULD be rather than how it is |
Sep 16, 2016 6:31am [quote] |
|
Getting a stone with each pair of what? If later in the game you take rsf with your third peep (and how often does that happen?) you would get rrssf. It seems like an attempt to make the space more appealing in the later stages of the game. | Sep 16, 2016 6:37am [quote] |
|
Quote from: ken on Sep 16, 2016 6:37am Getting a stone with each pair of what? If later in the game you take rsf with your third peep (and how often does that happen?) you would get rrssf. It seems like an attempt to make the space more appealing in the later stages of the game. You receive 1w OR 1c OR 1r AND 1s. It could be (1w OR 1c OR 1r) AND 1s. Or it could be 1w OR 1c OR (1r AND 1s). I am OK with going along with Ken and Nwoll's interpretation of the card, and agree that if you get a stone every time it would probably be too strong, but the wording has to be changed obviously |
Sep 16, 2016 6:45am [quote] (Edit: Sep 16, 2016 6:53am) |
|
Let's hear from Uwe/Chris/Zlorfik - someone - to help us with this card, please. I know others disagree with me but the format should be written 1/2/3+ or 1/2/3/4+ at least... the placement of the word "and" is incorrect and it's misleading... We need to know where the "stone" falls - 4th peep or with any peep in addition to the others... | Sep 16, 2016 7:09am [quote] |
|