id=945 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Cost=1W,1S, Vps=0, Prereq=none Whenever you extend or renovate your home, you may pay with Reed directly from Accumulation spaces. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Pitchfork (minor)Sep 12, 2010 7:46am [quote] (Edit: Aug 29, 2011 11:01am) |
|
remove the amount of the reed you use from the action spaces to the general supply. Hope those are straight forward from the current text. |
my intention is you can pay in full or partially from the action spaces.Sep 12, 2010 7:47am [quote] |
|
Wow super interesting idea. I like it. | Sep 12, 2010 3:48pm [quote] |
|
Maybe the cost should be "1W and (1S or 1R)" or "1W and (1S or 2C)" to make it more playable in 2-ER and 3-ER. | Sep 12, 2010 5:52pm [quote] |
|
In 3er I would be happy to take 1 stone early for my Axe. |
my feeling is that it's power is quite close to Axe, so I put the same resource to be safe.Sep 13, 2010 5:49am [quote] (Edit: Sep 13, 2010 5:49am) |
|
I think this card is pretty strong as getting Reed without an action is a pretty good deal. I'd like to see it in action though before I decide Y or N. |
How does this interact with Reed Buyer? Sep 30, 2010 12:14am [quote] |
|
well, you will not see it in action since it got quite a few N votes without bothering to explain. | Oct 5, 2010 2:16pm [quote] |
|
i don't like the stone cost. this makes it very weak to unusable in 1-3 player games. in 4ers i think its overpowered. it should be restricted to a maximum of 1 reed per action. | Jan 4, 2011 5:08am [quote] |
|
We should play test this before changing anything. This card is much stronger in 2,3-ER where Reed is scarce, so the Stone cost may be needed. I would like someone to play it in 4-ER so we can see how strong it is in 4-ER. | Jan 4, 2011 7:49am [quote] |
|
in 2-3ers its also less likely to have much reed available on the game board. that evens out. also stone is more scarce and valuable by the way. | Jan 5, 2011 7:02am [quote] |
|