id=961 | ||
COMMENTS | author | |
Cost=none, Vps=1, Prereq=2 animals Whenever you play an Occupation, you receive 1 Food before you pay the cost of the Occupation. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
Lamp Oil (minor)Sep 15, 2010 2:11am [quote] (Edit: May 18, 2011 3:49pm) |
|
Alternative to Bookshelf. 2f too much? | Sep 15, 2010 2:53am [quote] (Edit: Sep 15, 2010 2:54am) |
|
remove "see below" and write "2 animals" in the prereq spot. Then remove your first sentence. | Sep 15, 2010 7:36am [quote] |
|
nice idea for a card. i don't mind the no cost / no points alternative to the 'shelf. | Sep 15, 2010 8:44am [quote] |
|
Quote from: chris on Sep 15, 2010 7:36am remove "see below" and write "2 animals" in the prereq spot. Then remove your first sentence. Thx. I first wanted to add another sentence about having 2 animals the whole time but dropped that. |
Sep 15, 2010 12:52pm [quote] |
|
I like it. | Sep 16, 2010 10:01am [quote] |
|
2f is too much in my oppinion. would rather give it a VP if you want to power it up. | Dec 22, 2010 2:58pm [quote] |
|
Quote from: letsdance on Dec 22, 2010 2:58pm 2f is too much in my oppinion. would rather give it a VP if you want to power it up. Do you think 1 VP and 1f per played occupation is more appropiate? I would like that as well. |
Dec 23, 2010 7:37am [quote] |
|
Quote Do you think 1 VP and 1f per played occupation is more appropiate? I would like that as well. i think that would be too strong. i think the intent of the prior statement was to have the card be worth 1pt. |
Dec 23, 2010 11:30am [quote] |
|
Quote from: hunter on Dec 23, 2010 11:30am Quote Do you think 1 VP and 1f per played occupation is more appropiate? I would like that as well. i think that would be too strong. i think the intent of the prior statement was to have the card be worth 1pt. Sorry I meant 1 VP on the card and 1f per Occupation. Otherwise it would be too strong, yes. |
Dec 23, 2010 11:32am [quote] |
|