CREATE AGRICOLA CARDS   Hello unknown (Sign In) or (Register)

Now Viewing:   Sorted By:   Cards per page:
    [GO BACK to List View]       5 of 109        Jump to:   [Print]
decktypenametextcostvpsprereqauthorLike It?Comments
5

[View] 		J4minorWooden Whey BucketEach time before you use the "Sheep" or "Cattle" accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1 wood and at no cost, respectively.1W0uwe
+1

2Y,1N,2??
[Vote Yes]
[Vote No]		[11 Comments]
last post:
2021-02-03 18:24:15
by firnefex


id=9945
Pages:  [1] [2]
+1
LIKE IT?
(2 Y, 1 N, 2 ??)
[Vote Yes]
[Vote No]
 COMMENTSauthor
Wooden Whey Bucket (minor)
Cost=1W,   Vps=0,   Prereq=none
Each time before you use the "Sheep" or "Cattle" accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1 wood and at no cost, respectively.

[View playtest games] [View all dealt games]		 .uwe
Feb 1, 2020 4:52pm
[quote]
Don't like the free stable on cattle, 1a spam is obnoxious already. Maybe 1f for the stable? I think 1w on either space is totally fine for this card. wsefranc
Feb 4, 2020 11:29pm
[quote]
Current wording: Each time before you use the "Sheep" or "Cattle" accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1 wood and at no cost, respectively.

No need for the word "respectively" in my opinion... And I would strike out the "and" in "and at no cost".

Each time before you use the Sheep or Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1 wood at no cost.		 wallfly
Mar 15, 2020 4:17am
[quote]
(Edit: Mar 15, 2020 7:46am)
Quote from: wallfly on Mar 15, 2020 4:17am
Current wording: Each time before you use the "Sheep" or "Cattle" accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1 wood and at no cost, respectively.

No need for the word "respectively" in my opinion... And I would strike out the "and" in "and at no cost".

Each time before you use the Sheep or Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1 wood at no cost.

But how do people know that the stable is no cost on the cattle space but costs 1w on the sheep space?

It needs the word "respectively" to communicate this.		 nwoll
Mar 15, 2020 2:41pm
[quote]
Oh! I see. Weird wording. I understand now. wallfly
Mar 16, 2020 4:06am
[quote]
Aren't slashes the standard for formatting cards like this? So the text could just be Each time you use the Sheep/Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly one stable for 1 wood/no cost. Maybe it's a bit clunky like this, so the current wording could be preferred. sidnv
Apr 3, 2020 2:41pm
[quote]
Quote from: sidnv on Apr 3, 2020 2:41pm
Aren't slashes the standard for formatting cards like this? So the text could just be Each time you use the Sheep/Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly one stable for 1 wood/no cost. Maybe it's a bit clunky like this, so the current wording could be preferred.

The publisher's comments/style guide says to avoid [number]/[number] to avoid looking like fractions (even nonsensical ones.) So that might be it.		 lumin
Apr 4, 2020 2:57am
[quote]
Quote from: sidnv on Apr 3, 2020 2:41pm
Aren't slashes the standard for formatting cards like this? So the text could just be Each time you use the Sheep/Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly one stable for 1 wood/no cost. Maybe it's a bit clunky like this, so the current wording could be preferred.

I would also write it like this:
"Each time before you use the Sheep/Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly 1 stable for 1/0 wood."

Quote from: lumin on Apr 4, 2020 2:57am
Quote from: sidnv on Apr 3, 2020 2:41pm
Aren't slashes the standard for formatting cards like this? So the text could just be Each time you use the Sheep/Cattle accumulation space, you can build exactly one stable for 1 wood/no cost. Maybe it's a bit clunky like this, so the current wording could be preferred.

The publisher's comments/style guide says to avoid [number]/[number] to avoid looking like fractions (even nonsensical ones.) So that might be it.

But that makes no sense to me. Why changing it when decks A, B and C are already written in that style? I mean that's the whole point of it, to make wording equal and not letting sound every card different!		 firnefex
Jun 27, 2020 11:35pm
[quote]
(Edit: Jun 27, 2020 11:40pm)
printed german card uses "bzw." were on older cards the would have used "/". luki
Jan 29, 2021 9:58pm
[quote]
Quote from: luki on Jan 29, 2021 9:58pm
printed german card uses "bzw." were on older cards the would have used "/".

No. Wooden Whey Bucket uses "bzw.", but this is not such a common expression, and quickly flying over Dulcinaria I found many more cards that use "/" instead.		 firnefex
Feb 2, 2021 12:28am
[quote]
(Edit: Feb 2, 2021 12:29am)
Pages:  [1] [2]
    [GO BACK to List View]       5 of 109        Jump to: